OPINION: IN RE ENGSTROM v. McCARTH (1 CA-CV 16-0689 FC)

CASE NUMBER: 1 CA-CV 16-0689 FC
TYPE: OPINION
DECISION: VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED
DIVISION: COA ONE
ORIGINAL CASE: ENGSTROM v. MCCARTHY
(FC2014-053640)
JUDICIAL OFFICER: Jennifer C. Ryan-Touhill, Judge
VENUE: Superior Court in Maricopa County

Dana Engstrom (“Mother”) and James McCarthy (“Father”)
both challenge the parenting time and legal decision-making terms of the decree dissolving their marriage. Because we find their Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure (“Rule”) 69 agreement binding and no explanation in the record for any modification, we vacate the legal decision-making and parenting time orders and remand for further proceedings.

Published Decision

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *