|CASE NUMBER:||1 CA-CV 16-0689 FC|
|DECISION:||VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED|
|ORIGINAL CASE:||ENGSTROM v. MCCARTHY
|JUDICIAL OFFICER:||Jennifer C. Ryan-Touhill, Judge|
|VENUE:||Superior Court in Maricopa County|
Dana Engstrom (“Mother”) and James McCarthy (“Father”)
both challenge the parenting time and legal decision-making terms of the decree dissolving their marriage. Because we find their Arizona Rule of Family Law Procedure (“Rule”) 69 agreement binding and no explanation in the record for any modification, we vacate the legal decision-making and parenting time orders and remand for further proceedings.