MYRICK v. MALONEY

SUMMARY:

(1) In this domestic-relations proceeding, did the trial court abuse its discretion by declining to award the appellant her attorney fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-324(A), given the significant disparity in the parties’ incomes?

(2) Are attorney fees available in a final judgment pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-403.08?


Appellate Case:  2 CA-CV 2014-0019

Original Case:  SP20030562

Jurisdiction:  Superior Court in Pima County

Respondent: Honorable Dean Christoffel, Judge Pro Tempore

Result:  AFFIRMED

Chief Judge Eckerstrom authored the opinion of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Miller and Judge Espinosa concurred.

Decision Type:  OPINION

Opinion Filed: 8/29/2014


For more information, see the decision document at https://www.appeals2.az.gov/Decisions/CV20140019Opinion.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *