(1) In this domestic-relations proceeding, did the trial court abuse its discretion by declining to award the appellant her attorney fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-324(A), given the significant disparity in the parties’ incomes?
(2) Are attorney fees available in a final judgment pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-403.08?
Appellate Case: 2 CA-CV 2014-0019
Original Case: SP20030562
Jurisdiction: Superior Court in Pima County
Respondent: Honorable Dean Christoffel, Judge Pro Tempore
Chief Judge Eckerstrom authored the opinion of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Miller and Judge Espinosa concurred.
Decision Type: OPINION
Opinion Filed: 8/29/2014
For more information, see the decision document at https://www.appeals2.az.gov/Decisions/CV20140019Opinion.pdf